Dracula 2000: A Modern Twist on a Classic Horror Story
Dracula 2000 is a 2000 American gothic horror film co-written and directed by Patrick Lussier and produced by Joel Soisson and Wes Craven. It stars Gerard Butler as Dracula, Christopher Plummer as Abraham Van Helsing, Jonny Lee Miller as Simon Sheppard, Justine Waddell as Mary Heller, and Jennifer Esposito as Solina. The film is based on Bram Stoker's original 1897 novel Dracula, but with a contemporary setting and a new origin story for the Count.
The plot follows Dracula, who is awakened in the 21st century by a group of thieves who steal his coffin from Van Helsing's antique shop in London. Dracula travels to New Orleans, where he seeks out Mary Heller, a descendant of Van Helsing and the reincarnation of his true love. Van Helsing and Simon, his apprentice, pursue Dracula and try to stop him from claiming Mary as his bride. Along the way, they encounter various vampires created by Dracula, including Solina, Marcus, Valerie Sharpe, and Lucy Westerman.
Dracula 2000 received mixed reviews from critics and audiences, who praised the cast and the action scenes, but criticized the script and the special effects. The film was a moderate box office success, grossing $47.1 million worldwide against a budget of $54 million. It spawned two direct-to-video sequels, Dracula II: Ascension (2003) and Dracula III: Legacy (2005), both written and directed by Lussier.
If you are a fan of horror movies and want to watch Dracula 2000 in Hindi, you can download it from various online platforms. However, be careful of illegal or pirated sites that may harm your device or expose you to malware. Always use trusted and secure sources to download movies online.
Dracula 2000 is a thrilling and entertaining movie that offers a fresh take on the classic vampire legend. It combines horror, action, romance, and mystery in a fast-paced and stylish way. If you are looking for a movie that will keep you on the edge of your seat and make your blood run cold, Dracula 2000 is the one for you.
Dracula 2000: A Movie Review
Dracula 2000 is not a masterpiece of horror cinema, but it is not a complete disaster either. It is a movie that tries to do something different with the Dracula mythos, but does not always succeed. It has some good ideas, some bad ideas, and some very cheesy ideas. It is a movie that can be enjoyed by fans of the genre, but not taken too seriously.
One of the good ideas of the movie is the casting of Gerard Butler as Dracula. Butler is charismatic, handsome, and menacing as the legendary vampire. He brings a sense of style and seduction to the role, as well as a hint of tragedy. He also has some witty lines and moments of humor, such as when he says \"I don't drink...coffee\" or when he mocks Van Helsing's accent. Butler is clearly having fun with the part, and he makes Dracula a compelling and attractive villain.
Another good idea of the movie is the twist on Dracula's origin story. The movie reveals that Dracula is actually Judas Iscariot, the betrayer of Jesus Christ, who was cursed by God to become a vampire after hanging himself. This explains why Dracula hates crosses, silver, and sunlight, and why he can only be killed by a stake through the heart. This twist adds a new layer of meaning and symbolism to the character, and also sets up an interesting conflict between Dracula and Mary, who wears a necklace with a silver coin from Judas' betrayal.
However, the movie also has some bad ideas that undermine its potential. One of them is the use of New Orleans as the setting for most of the action. While New Orleans is a fascinating and colorful city, it does not have much connection to Dracula or his history. The movie tries to justify this choice by saying that New Orleans is a city of sin and decadence, where Dracula can find plenty of victims and followers. But this rationale is weak and clichÃd, and does not make much sense. The movie also wastes the opportunity to explore the rich culture and history of New Orleans, and instead resorts to stereotypes and clichÃs, such as Mardi Gras parades, voodoo shops, and jazz clubs.
Another bad idea of the movie is the use of Wes Craven's name in the title. Wes Craven is one of the most respected and influential horror filmmakers of all time, known for creating classics such as A Nightmare on Elm Street , Scream , and The Hills Have Eyes . However, Craven did not direct or write Dracula 2000; he only served as an executive producer. His name was used as a marketing ploy to attract audiences who expected a high-quality horror film from him. But this was misleading and unfair, both to Craven and to the viewers. Craven's involvement in the movie was minimal, and his style and vision were not reflected in it.
Finally, the movie also has some very cheesy ideas that make it hard to take seriously. One of them is the use of Virgin Records as a major plot device. Mary works at a Virgin megastore in New Orleans, where she meets Simon and where Dracula attacks her. Later, she discovers that her father Van Helsing owns Virgin Records, which he uses as a cover for his vampire-hunting activities. This is a ridiculous and contrived coincidence that serves no purpose other than to promote Virgin Records as a brand. The movie also features several scenes where Virgin Records products are prominently displayed or mentioned, such as CDs, posters, T-shirts, etc. This is blatant product placement that distracts from the story and breaks the immersion.
Another cheesy idea of the movie is the use of pop music stars as actors. The movie features several singers who play minor roles or cameo appearances as vampires or victims. These include Vitamin C (Colleen Fitzpatrick), who plays Lucy Westerman; Jeri Ryan , who plays Valerie Sharpe; Shane West , who plays JT; Moby , who plays himself; Fred Durst , who plays himself; Linkin Park , who play themselves; etc. These singers are not very convincing or memorable as actors, and their presence seems more like a gimmick than a creative choice. They also contribute to the soundtrack of the movie, which consists mostly of rock songs that do not fit well with the mood or tone of the film. ec8f644aee